Focus and Scope
- Open Submissions
- Peer Reviewed
Peer Review Process
Every article submitted to the editor will be received first by the staff editor then selected the selection editor for the next stage. the next stage through the Initial Review process by the selection Editor. The selection editor will continue the article to the reviewer stage and sent it to the editorial board and the executive editor will follow the next selection of the Review Process stage. After that, the article of the review process will be sent to the selection editor to be received or returned to the author for revision. This process takes a month for a maximum time. In each manuscript, the editorial board and peer reviewers will be assessed from substantial and technical aspects.
All submitted manuscripts are read by editorial staff. the manuscript evaluated by the editor becomes incompatible with journal criteria rejected immediately without any external reviews. The manuscript evaluated to be a potential interest for our readers is sent to at least 1 (one) reviewers desks. The editor then makes a decision based on reviewers' recommendations of several possibilities: rejected, revision required, or accepted. The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published.
- The author submits the script
- Editor's Evaluation (some manuscripts denied or returned before the review process)
- Peer-reviewed at least 1 (one) reviewers
- Editor's Decision
- Confirm to an author
Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara is published twice a year: February and July.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
Publication Ethics Statement
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
We follow Core Practices of COPE including Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Editors
Duties for Editors
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Screening for Plagiarism Policy
In the publication, the Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara strongly opposes plagiarism on its own merits. The Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara is committed to blocking plagiarism, including self-plagiarism.
Authors must ensure that they have written the original work completely, and if the author has used the work and/or the words of others that have been quoted or quoted appropriately. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and the author strongly advised. Also, an important part of the work has not been published. The author also respects the writing in the Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara of publication, duplicate, or excessive fraud.
Before the author submits a script to the Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara at least to first check the use of plagiarism. When submitting published articles for authenticity checks, the Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara recommends the use of Turnitin or iThenticate, Scanner from http://turnitin.com/ and http://ithenticate.com/. Before using Plagiarism Turnitin for the first time, we strongly recommend that authors read the instructions for using this plagiarism detector. The detector plagiarism system for the Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara uses and is affiliated with Turnitin or iThenticate.
* Please note that the Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara affiliated with Turnitin or iThenticate. *
The article has not been published in other media and does not contain plagiarism. Preferably the author should use reference management software, eg for Mendeley. The bibliography and reference system for the Jurnal Abdimas Jatibara uses Mendeley. Plagiarism checking is carried out in the process of screening submitted or submitted manuscripts and then meeting the minimum similarity requirement, which is below 25%.
Author fee (Publication Charge)
This journal charges the following author fees.
Submission Fees: 0.00 (IDR)
Publication Fees: 0.00 (IDR)
CrossMark, a CrossRef multi-publisher project, offers a standard way to find the definitive edition of a text for readers. Elsevier acknowledges the importance to scholars and librarians of the credibility and completeness of the scholarly record and attaches the highest importance to preserving trust in the authority of its electronic database. By pressing the CrossMark button, the reader will be told of the document's current status and will also include detailed information on the document's publishing history.
Retraction, Withdrawal, Correction, Removal, Replacement (R-W-C-R-R) Policy, click here.